A few weeks ago Peter Strawn posted a great blog post, where he compared the game of soccer to learning. This solicited a comment from me and launched me into volunteering to moderate for #slowchatEd so I could have a conversation with anyone willing to participate. Then last week, I saw this tweet:
It seems as if students are beginning to understand the process of learning, seeing that traditional grading practices may not reflect what is really happening. So, this weeks #slowchatED will focus on grading practices that encourage curiosity, risk taking, and help reduce the stigma of failure.
Questions for the week are below and are subject to change, to reflect the flow of the conversation.
- Q1 - What is your experience with grades? Positive, Negative? (as student, teacher, and/or parent)
- Q2 - What do your students' grades reflect? (completion, mastery, practice, etc.)
- Q3 - Can traditional grades reflect the kind of learning we want from students? Do they allow for failure?
- Q4 - How can grades reflect curiosity and risk taking? Should they?
- Q5 - How would you design your dream grading system? What to include? Should you have one at all?
- Q6 - Based on this week's conversation. Will you change your grading practices? Why/Why not? How?
Q1 will be tweeted Monday morning. Follow the #slowchatEd and join the conversation.